July 23, 2008
But Will They Respect Him In The Morning?
Printer FriendlyBy: Ann Coulter
Back before the Republican Party was saddled with John McCain as its nominee, The New York Times called him "the only Republican who promises to end the George Bush style of governing from and on behalf of a small, angry fringe." The paper praised him for "working across the aisle to develop sound bipartisan legislation" and predicted that he would appeal to "a broader range of Americans than the rest of the Republican field."
At the same time, the Times denounced "the real" Rudy Giuliani as "a narrow, obsessively secretive, vindictive man" and Mitt Romney as "shape-shifting," claiming it's "hard to find an issue on which he has not repositioned himself to the right since he was governor of Massachusetts."
Here are a few issues I found that Romney hadn't switched positions on, and it wasn't "hard": tax cuts, health care, same-sex marriage, illegal immigration and the surge in Iraq. The only issue on which Romney had changed his position was abortion, irritating people who would prefer for Republicans to refuse to run in places like Massachusetts and New York City in order to preserve their perfect pro-life credentials.
Times columnist Nicholas Kristof echoed the editorial page in early February with a column titled: "Who Is More Electable?" In the very first sentence, Kristof concluded that McCain is "the Republican most likely to win the November election." Kristof touted McCain's "unusual appeal among swing voters" and cited polls that showed McCain would do "stunningly well" in a general election.
Also in February, CNN produced polls showing McCain doing better than "generic Republican" in a general election, which Jeffrey Toobin said was a tribute to how "well respected" McCain is. Hey, is it too late for us to nominate "generic Republican"?
And on MSNBC's "Hardball," from the way Chris Matthews carried on about McCain, you'd think he had caught a glimpse of Obama's ankle. Matthews said that McCain was "the real straight talker ... a profile in courage ... more seasoned than the current president, a patriot, of course ... honest and respected in the media. He has all the pluses in the world of a sort of a, you know, an Audie Murphy, if you will, a real war hero."
I guess the party's over.
Now the Times won't even publish McCain's op-ed. I wouldn't have published it either -- I've read it twice and I still can't remember what it says -- but I also wouldn't have published McCain's seven op-eds in The New York Times since 1996.
Since McCain has gone from being a Republican "maverick" who attacks Republicans and promotes liberal causes to the Republican nominee for president, he's also gone from being one of the Times' most frequent op-ed guest columnists to being an unpublishable illiterate.
I looked up McCain's oeuvre for the Times, and if you want unpublishable, that's unpublishable. In one column, McCain assailed Republicans for their lack of commitment to the environment, noting that polls -- probably the same ones showing him to be the most "electable" Republican -- indicated that "the environment is the voters' number-one concern about continued Republican leadership of Congress."
McCain concluded with this ringing peroration: "(O)ur nation's continued prosperity hinges on our ability to solve environmental problems and sustain the natural resources on which we all depend." That's good writing -- I mean assuming you're writing hack press releases for an irrelevant environmentalist think tank.
The rest of McCain's op-eds in the Times bravely took on -- I quote -- "unnecessary regulation" and "pork-barrel spending." It's that sort of courage and clear-headedness that tells me we're going to be OK this fall.
In coming out four-square against "unnecessary regulation" and "pork-barrel spending," McCain threw down the gauntlet to those who favor "unnecessary regulation" and "pork-barrel spending." Actually, I think there's a rule that says you're not being brave if there is not a single person in the world who would publicly disagree with you.
While the media are busy telling McCain that "It's not you, it's us," Al Gore, a recent Democratic candidate for president, has become certifiably nuts. Gore's increasingly bizarre public statements are a reminder of the dangers of going off carbs cold turkey.
On "Meet the Press" last weekend, Gore called on America to be carbon dioxide-free within 10 years. In the same spirit of pointlessness and futility, I call on America to be 100 percent oxygen-free within 10 years.
Say, how do "hot lap dances" affect global warming? Last week, a Gore supporter, Louis Posner, enraged over the result of the 2000 presidential election and founder of the Democratic voter organization Voter March, was arrested in New York on charges of prostitution and money laundering.
According to the police, in addition to sponsoring events with Vincent Bugliosi about Bush stealing the 2000 election, Posner ran a prostitution ring out of his club, the Hot Lap Dance Club, where employees say they were required to have sex with Posner in order to work there. No wonder Posner was so testy about the 2000 election -- he wanted to preserve the glory of the Clinton years.
Imagine the important reporting we could have gotten on the Hot Lap Dance Club story if only the entire American media weren't with the Messiah on his "Ich Bin Ein Berlitzer" Tour!
But a two-week vacation in Europe is just what B. Hussein Obama needs to polish up his speech about how all our geopolitical challenges are due to American boorishness and stupidity. That ought to make for a boffo op-ed in The New York Times.
Posted by redguy at July 23, 2008 09:11 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.redstatesusa.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/975
Comments
Is anyone else NOT surprised at the reaction from the German people at the thought of Obama speaking there? The heart of Socialist Europe falling for another charismatic lunatic bent on destruction, ah I mean change. He is a Marxist, a black separatist involved with racist and criminal organizations, has shown complete disregard for Israel's safety, aligns himself with terrorists nations like Iran while people follow without question and faint in his presence. Are we sure it's not 1935?
Adolph's book talked about the evil of the Jews while Obama's talks about the evil of "White" people. Adolph hated capitalism just like Herr Obama. Adolph wanted Government control of everything just like Herr Obama, Adolph banned the possession of firearms, just like Herr Obama supports, Talking bad about Adolph in 1935 brought down the wrath of his mindless followers just like it does today with Obama, the only difference is then you were called a juden sympathizer, while today your a racist. I can see this in the near future.... Kanzler Obama erklärt Amerika das neue Haus des nationalen sozialismus. Just remember WORK WILL MAKE YOU FREE!!!!!
hageln meinen Führer Obama
Posted by: mfee01
at July 24, 2008 07:30 AM
Actually, Romney did change his positions on: tax cuts, health care, same-sex marriage, and illegal immigration.
Oh, and gun-control.
But it's good to know you feel pro-life candidates should support pro-choice legislation to get elected.
It's exactly the shape-shifting reason Republicans and CONservatives will be banished from office for decades to come.
Posted by: kevind
at July 24, 2008 07:54 AM
Great article again Ann. Your wit and writing style are soooo captivating. You even attract haters like Kevind who have no idea what they are talking about...
Posted by: PDMac60
at July 24, 2008 09:47 AM
A word to the wise, including you Ann:
Sometimes you just have to make the best with what you've got. Let's be honest, neither of
the Bush's were perfect and Nixon....please! Even Reagan had his warts if you take off the rose colored glasses and look at some of the things he did. McCain at the very least
will try to appoint regular people to the Supreme Court and the federal district courts. It might be hard with an all left Senate, but it's the best we can hope for. More important is that we need someone in the WH who appreciates what's at stake in the War on Terror. Obama is so mistaken on this issue that it should scare us into
voting for another Kennedy rather than what the Dems are offering up. And let's not forget the imminent threat of the automatic repeal of the Bush tax cuts. Without some serious leadership to convince the democrats in Washington not to play chicken with our economy and make permanent these tax cuts, we are heading for the
biggest economic downturn since the Great Depression. I believe McCain's right on this issue now.
By the way this column got cut short on your
Human Events blog. I would have missed Al Gore's
wanting to be carbon dioxide-free within 10 years.
Perhaps he meant Carbon Monoxide but either way
he's as stupid as a door!
Posted by: GW Bramhall
at July 24, 2008 10:28 AM
How come you make it so difficult to read the
readers comments?
Posted by: GW Bramhall
at July 24, 2008 04:21 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
