February 13, 2008

There's A Democrat Behind Door No. 1, 2, and 3

Printer Friendly

By: Ann Coulter

A few more primary wins and B. Hussein Obama will be able to light up a cigarette during a televised speech and still get the nomination. It looks like the only thing that can stop him now is an endorsement from Al Gore.

Gore is always lunging into a movement just as it has passed its prime -- the Internet, Howard Dean, global warming, trying to talk black when he campaigns at a black church. He probably bought a big house a few months ago. Gore is such a supremely unlikable human being, he even subverted the mainstream media's affection for liberalism during the 2000 election.

And my brave little Hillary needs a bold move after the Potomac primaries this week. If she can't trick Gore into endorsing Obama, she may have to divorce Bill.

Hillary is, shockingly enough, the most conservative candidate among the top three presidential candidates.

The Rev. Jerry Falwell once remarked that his people would rather vote for Beelzebub than Hillary Clinton.

He didn't mention John McCain.

Pat Buchanan says if McCain is the nominee, the Republican Party will lose its soul. I'm more worried about the Republican Party losing its mind.

Republicans are doing what the Democrats tried in 2004 with John Kerry. In a state of despair, Democrats dumped the legitimate leader of their party, Howard Dean, for a candidate they deemed "electable." Kerry served in Vietnam! Republicans: Conniving has never been our strong suit. Honor is our strong suit.

Sen. John McCain's claim to being a Republican comes down to two factors:

(1) He was a POW -- I know that because he mentions it more often than John Kerry told us that he served in Vietnam.
And (2) he has a relatively conservative voting record compared to, say, Maxine Waters.

I note that there were hundreds of POWS in Vietnam. We can't make them all president. If we're just going to pick one, how about one who doesn't want to shut down Guantanamo and give amnesty to 20 million illegal immigrants? Hey, didn't Duncan Hunter serve in Vietnam? Why, yes, I believe he did!

Moreover, it's crazy to imagine that military service makes one qualified to be president. Everyone knows the true test of presidential leadership is an ability to cry on cue. Another point for my Hillary.

To be sure, McCain has a relatively conservative voting record -- but only relative to Republicans who have to get elected in places like Vermont. Relative to Republicans from conservative Arizona, McCain's voting record is abominable.

We keep hearing about McCain's "lifetime" rating from the American Conservative Union being 82.3 percent. But McCain has been a member of Congress for approximately 400 years, so that includes his votes on the Spanish-American War. His more current ratings are not so hot.

In 2006 -- the most recent year for which ratings are available -- McCain's ACU rating was 65. That year, the ACU rating for the other senator from Arizona, Jon Kyl, was 97. Even Chuck Hagel's ACU rating was 75, and Lindsey Graham's was 83.

Since 1998, only four Republican senators have had worse ACU scores than John McCain -- and none were from Goldwater country: Lincoln Chafee, Susan Collins, Olympia Snowe and Arlen Specter. The last time McCain ranked this far down in his class, he was at the Naval Academy.

In fact, McCain and Romney are mirror opposites: As Romney had to tailor his conservative views to the liberal voters of Massachusetts, McCain has had to tailor his liberal views to the conservative voters of Arizona. While Romney's record in a liberal bastion is as bad as it will ever be, McCain's record from a conservative bastion is as good as it will ever be. Which isn't very good.

In the immortal words of -- well, me, actually: Always choose a strong conservative from a blue state over a lukewarm conservative from a red state.

Bob Dole from Kansas had a pretty good voting record, too. But no one fully believed he believed it. Another feather in his cap was that he didn't burden voters with a "Straight Talk Express," a means of conveyance even more useless and idiotic than an electric car.

Even McCain's supporters on the Spaghetti-Spined Express know he can't be trusted on social issues like abortion. I notice how everyone seems to agree that of course Rudy Giuliani's voters would go to McCain.

Why would that be? On the two seminal issues of our time other than abortion -- taxes and the war on terrorism -- the two could not be more different.

Rudy cut taxes in New York City and, as a presidential candidate, proposed the biggest tax cut in U.S. history.

McCain voted against Bush's tax cuts twice.

Rudy supports torturing terrorists -- or using "enhanced interrogation techniques," as they say, announcing in one of the debates: "I would tell the people who had to do the interrogation to use every method they could think of."

McCain is hysterical about pouring water down terrorists' noses and campaigns to shut down Guantanamo.

He demands that no terrorist interrogation be "degrading" -- perhaps recalling how not degrading it was for people in the upper floors of the Twin Towers to have to leap to their deaths rather than be burned alive on Sept. 11.

So why is it obvious to everyone that Rudy would endorse McCain?

Because everyone knows he'll take the liberal position on social issues like abortion -- and everything else -- as soon as he doesn't need the voters of Arizona anymore.

Posted by redguy at February 13, 2008 08:14 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.redstatesusa.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/882

Comments

The dems' strategy seems clever, but cynical. They know they can rely on their own constituency to vote for a black male and/or a white female, no matter what they do or say. That leaves them free to woo the republican votes with carrots like reforming child custody legislation to consider men's rights, which is what Hillary is offering.

Moreover, the republican party has done more to turn the US into a communist totalitarian state than the democrats have. Our rights to privacy are gone: just gone. More wealth has been put back into the hands of the wealthy. We have very little or no voice. Large, government-like organizations like big oil, communications, medicine, real estate, insurance, banking and law are free to run roughshod over us. (Just be late for one credit card payment; I dare you.)
In the last four years I've seen TSA agents put my 80-year-old mom against the wall, spread eagle, and search her. I've been carded by cops for walking down the street at night in front of my house, fishing pole in hand. The US Supreme Court has crapped all over or Constitutional Rights at the behest of angry moms against everybody.

It's always in the name of law and order. Like DUI lawyer Lawrence Taylor says, "First they came for drunks, but I wasn't a drunk, so I didn't speak up . . .."

Meanwhile, during Clinton's presidency, the wealth was being redistributed. The US economy was creating millonaires at record rates. The lower and middle economic classes were getting rich.

If there's one thing wealthy people can't stand, it's poor people getting money. So when the republicans got back into power, they reversed all of that, and now I dare say the averge daily income is plummeting while prices--has anyone gone grocery shopping lately?--are leaping higher and higher.

No rights; power and wealth in the hands of the party elite; clamp-downs on freedom in the names of "law and order" and "national security": it's all right there, and the worst things are that a considerable percentage of the US population can't even speak the language; of those who can speak it, a considerable percentage can't read the language; of those who can read it the language, a considerable percentage get all their information from television and newspaper.

BOHICA! Don't worry: no need to be afraid. It's going to hurt, but it always does, and there's nothing anybody who can do something about it will do.

That was guaranteed when we abandoned the founding fathers' basically aristotelian model of government and adopted the platonic model.

By the way, I'm a very well educated, really bright conservative who's always voted repbulican across the board. But now . . . I think I'll expatriate myself to some island nation and get drunk because I don't have any kids.

Posted by: Florida Cane [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 14, 2008 07:03 AM

This very well may be the year America suddenly understands why gun control laws are a bad idea. ...

Posted by: mechmorph [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 14, 2008 07:59 AM

There is hope.

Not to mention faith.

If the grass roots will ignite to vote or write in Huck, Mitt, or best Fred we can enjoy an old fashioned brokered convention whereby our delegates can duke out something (anything) better than Juan McCain.

Let the smoke-filled back rooms prevail!

Our own men (and even Fox News journalists) have experienced the faux 'torture' of waterboarding. Our government says we've only done it thrice. I say let's waterboard every bastard in Gitmo and see what else we can learn.

I resent the hell out my SS taxes contributions going to illegals.

I resent the hell out of not being able to contribute my own money to the candidate of my choice after a moment in time.

But... more than any other single issue--the socialist plot to promulgate climate change and carbon credits is the ultimate deal killer for me.

God gave us coal and oil and the ability to figure out how to use these fuels to create a dynamic economy. So-called 'progressives' want to reverse that. Up is down. These 'progressives' are Luddites. Remember--when asked for a show of hands--McCain's was first up.

Last and perhaps foremost, he seems to make some decisions in angry and personal reasoning. Very scary in a president.

Posted by: turn [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 14, 2008 08:45 AM

Why are conservative pundits spending so much time bashing McCain (deservedly), but not coming out to support any particular candidate?? Just say it, Ann - RON PAUL is the answer to the party's crises! A true conservative, a genuinely honest person who cannot be bought & paid for or manipulated like a puppet on a string. C'mon, Ann, it's way past time for someone with your clout to keep bashing our "front runners" and focus on the positive by supporting someone!

Posted by: CaPagrl [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 14, 2008 11:11 AM

B"H Ann, you have really out done yourself in the wit department, while hammering home some important points.

Excellent post!

The liberals may be to stupid to listen to you (although I have no doubt you're catching their attention these days).

I just hope the conservatives do.

Posted by: Ben-Yehudah [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 14, 2008 06:57 PM

A local radio "conservative" in Kansas City tied Valentine's Day to McCain in his daily message by saying that McCain is like the person you married, not perfect but good. Using that analogy, if McCain is like our spouse, then he is unfaithful. He has cheated on us before. In fact, has had a long affair. And he will be unfaithful again. It's time for a Divorce! McCain should have been kicked out of the party after the "Gang of Fourteen" or at least stripped of any important roles. Now we know why he wasn't.

Posted by: snowmane [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 14, 2008 09:32 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


Regular Columnists

Ann Coulter
David Limbaugh
Debbie Schlussel
Rachel Marsden
Chris Adamo

Interesting Reads