April 11, 2007
Ho Ho Ho, Merry Imus!
Printer FriendlyBy: Ann Coulter
The only person happier than Larry Birkhead about the big announcement that he is the father of Anna Nicole Smith's baby is Don Imus. By the way, what's the word for a woman who gives birth to a child of uncertain paternity?
English speakers in America need a rule book to tell us what people can say what words when, and under which set of circumstances. The rule book will be longer than the Patriot Act and will require weekly updates as new words and circumstances are added. Perhaps a Nasdaq-style ticker would be more efficient.
Depending on which TV show you tune into, what Imus said was wrong because: (1) His show goes out on FCC-regulated airwaves; (2) he regularly interviews people like Sens. John Kerry, John McCain and Joe Biden; (3) he spoke at the White House Correspondents' Dinner a few years ago; or (4) he's not black.
Perhaps sensing that such constantly scrolling rules have a whiff of fascism about them, the scowling Miss Grundys of the world think they have hit on the perfect omnibus rule. They instruct us to "be nice." (There's a word for the grim Miss Grundys, but apparently I'm not allowed to use it. Sarah Silverman is. This will be all in the rule book.)
The requirement to always "be nice" would be the end of Chris Rock and Dave Chappelle, two of the funniest comedians in America. Let me rephrase that: It would be the end of all humor. Even Bob Hope cruelly implied that Democrats didn't support the troops when he joked to the troops in Vietnam: "The country is behind you 50 percent."
At least we'll still be able to watch the "Charlie Rose" show! Actually, for all anyone knows, Rose is calling women "nappy-headed hos" on TV every night since no one has ever seen his show.
In addition to ending all humor, we'll lose all political debate. For Americans over 4 years old, people in the public sphere are engaged in serious arguments — over abortion, illegal immigration, how much money the government takes from you, and the pre-eminent battle of our time against Islamic fascists. The "be nice" admonition is the sort of thing stupid girls say when they can't think of anything substantive to say.
I, for one, promise to implement the "be nice" policy just as soon as the other side surrenders.
Say, does anyone remember if Winston Churchill was "nice" in his public pronouncements about Hitler? Was he even nice to his fellow countrymen with whom he disagreed?
No, I don't think he was! This is what Winston Churchill said about the Labor Party's Ramsay MacDonald:
"I remember when I was a child, being taken to the celebrated Barnum's Circus, which contained an exhibition of freaks and monstrosities, but the exhibit on the program which I most desired to see was the one described as 'The Boneless Wonder.' My parents judged that the spectacle would be too demoralizing and revolting for my youthful eye, and I have waited 50 years to see The Boneless Wonder sitting on the Treasury Bench."
And guess what public figure was constantly accused of making "outrageous" remarks, trading in "insults, trashings and character assassinations"? Of what public figure was it asked: "Who can examine this record of insults and say that here is a man of class?"
That's right: Ronald Reagan. Those particular quotes are from Washington Post columnists Richard Cohen and Colman McCarthy.
Was Reagan "nice" to the Soviets? They certainly didn't think so. The Soviets constantly denounced Reagan as "rude," and our dear friends at the BBC upbraided Reagan for his "rude attacks" on Fidel Castro, Nicaragua and the Soviet Union. Post columnist McCarthy indignantly charged that Reagan had "put down an entire nation — the Soviet Union — by calling it 'the focus of evil in the nuclear world.'"
Oh dear! Reagan wasn't "nice." No wonder he never accomplished anything.
One more item for the delusional Miss Grundys still obtusely citing Reagan as their model of "niceness": As governor of California, Reagan gave student protesters at Berkeley the finger. Remember that next time you ask yourself: "What would Reagan do?"
People who are afraid of ideas whitewash Reagan like they whitewash Jesus. Sorry to break it to you, but the Reagan era did not consist of eight years of Reagan joking about his naps.
The reason people don't like what Imus said was because the women on the Rutgers basketball team aren't engaged in public discourse. They're not public figures, they don't have a forum, they aren't trying to influence public policy.
They play basketball — quite well, apparently — and did nothing to bring on an attack on their looks or character. It's not the words Imus used: It would be just as bad if he had simply said the Rutgers women were ugly and loose.
People claim to object to the words alone, but that's because everyone is trying to fit this incident into a PC worldview. It's like girls who say, "It's not that you cheated on me; it's that you lied about it." No — it's that you cheated.
If Imus had called me a "towheaded ho" or Al Sharpton a "nappy-headed ho," it would be what's known as "funny." (And if he called Anna Nicole Smith a "flaxen-headed ho," it would be "absolutely accurate.") But he attacked the looks and morals of utterly innocent women, who had done nothing to inject themselves into public debate.
Imus should apologize to the Rutgers women — and those women alone — send them flowers, and stop kissing Al Sharpton's ring.
This wasn't an insult to all mankind, and certainly not an insult to Al Sharpton. Now, if Imus had called the basketball players "fat, race-baiting black men with clownish hairstyles," well, then perhaps Sharpton would be owed an apology.
Posted by redguy at April 11, 2007 08:18 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.redstatesusa.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/719
Comments
Well said, Ann, and spot on as always. Too many have been afflicted with a case of “Queens-of-Hearts by Proxy Syndrome.” The pundits, race-baiters, fear-mongers, NY Times editorial staff, garden variety ne’er-do-wells, hemp-saturated Birkenstockistas and other liberals are constantly in high dudgeon and having difficulty walking due to the knot in their collective panties as a result of hearing something then saying that that word or phrase “means what I want it to mean, as long as someone who is a minority may possibly be offended so I can go on an unbridled hissy-fit.”
Imus is reprobate for his remarks. They were an unfair characterization and quite frankly disturbing. (Almost as disturbing to learn that he was still on the air after all these years, I had thought he had faded into oblivion by now.) But, he said it, even if he did not mean it, and as awful as it was, he needs to take his licks.
Censuring him, silencing him, firing him are not the answers. If his sponsors want to drop him, fine, that is their prerogative. The real jury must be we, the people. If we do not want to hear racist and insensitive remarks, we need not listen to him, much the same way that most smart people in the world ignore Al $harpton. (Who knew HE had a radio show?)
There is no compelling reason why one ought be nice when dealing with folks who aren’t. As I am fond of quoting Rodney King, “why can’t we call just get along”, yet the answer is simple; some people just don’t want to and a few bad apples, etc, etc…
But all this said, where is the apology to the Duke athletes? When $harpton was Johnny-on-the-spot to offer his quick evaluation and pronouncement of guilt on the “Durham 3” he was lauded as a defender of the poor and downtrodden. Now, as it is exposed that the poor downtrodden stripper was, well, a very big liar, where are the apologies from $harpton and the others?
Does anyone see a pattern here?
God Bless and God Speed
John
Posted by: Jaksavin
at April 12, 2007 08:18 AM
Imus is an 'entertainer', and not a very good one in my opinion.
To some people, outrageous statements are simply an attention-grabbing device (albeit a rather sick one).
However, if listeners don't like what he says, they should simply turn him off.
Same thing with his sponsors. If they don't like his message, don't sponsor his show.
That's how people 'vote'.
But I'm guessing, since 9 more newspapers dropped your column after the Edwards comment, you already knew that.
Posted by: kevind
at April 12, 2007 09:40 AM
Yes I would like to know where are all the apologies and where are all the black and white ministers who were ready to lynch the three white boys at Duke University, for their alleged atrocities to this African-American woman who claimed to have been raped by them. I would like to know when those three former Duke University lacrosse players will be apologized to and how bout the coach for the lacrosse team and everything else that happened all for nothing. And here we go into our second or third week of wringing our hands that what Donnie Imus said. Great column Ann, I hope you can keep up the good work and point out the hypocrisy that seems to rein in the politically correct circles of this country. I'd like to see where are all the apologies from all the professors who signed that paper and had it published in the newspaper. There are a lot of hypocrisies going on and yet everyone seems to have a short memory for those few individuals who seem to profit the most from making the biggest seen about these unfortunate comments made by Don Imus. People should listen to the audio clip of Angelina lacrosse Wisconsin on the Rush Limbaugh website. They have a whole different perspective of how to take comments made by somebody else.
Posted by: Joseph M. Gates
at April 12, 2007 01:03 PM
Dead on accurate as usual, Ann!
I get really tired of the “word police” and their garbage about what you can and can’t say, who can and can’t say what, and which words have made their ever growing list for the day.
Growing up, I was always taught “sticks and stones”. Due to political correctness and a liberal education system (and borrowing some “Rush” terminology), today we are raising wimpy, whiney “skulls full of mush” that are afraid they’ll be called a name.
You are right that Imus should apologize to the Rutgers Women’s Basketball Team and only them. Apologizing to Al Sharpton is the equivalent of me insulting Ann Coulter and then apologizing to Debbie Schlussel or Rush Limbaugh for what I said about Ann. It’s ludicrous!
And exactly when are we going to hear bull-horn Al Sharpton apologize to the 6 innocent white men in the Tawana Brawley incident, and to the 3 innocent white students in the Duke Rape case?
And while we’re at it, when are we going to relish in an apology from Jessie Jackson for his “hymie town” remark?
I’m not a fan of Don Imus, never have been and therefore never listen to him. If advertisers pull their ads and listeners turn him off, that’s their decision. But, apologize to Al Sharpton? Imus is weak. He’s not considering running for office as a Republican, is he?
And you’re right. If we are ever “treated” to a rule book of acceptable and unacceptable words and phrases and the who, when, where and how to use or not use them, it would be larger than Encyclopedia Britannica, would read like stereo instructions, and would have to come in both English and Spanish.
Posted by: LynnJG
at April 12, 2007 02:04 PM
If I were the Durham 3 I would not want an apology. Too many people would expect accpetance of an apology. I would rather win the civil suits: against the Stripper, the Duke Admin & Faculty, the Duke Sports Dept., every media outlet that reprted me guilty, Nifong, Sharpton, Jackson, etc.
Posted by: enemaofthestatusquo
at April 12, 2007 10:40 PM
ESQ: I would want the apology for the simple reason to show that I was a bigger person than my accusers. Additionally I would play, replay and replay again the apology by Al $harpton. As he has never apologized for any of his other antics/crimes/lawsuits it would be priceless.
Sadly the Dook Administration and the cabal of 80-odd faculty members still remain irony-proof, apparently under some sort of Ward Churchill-like psuedo-cloak of invincibility. Being as far left as they are there is scant chance that they will see the error of their ways, even after losing a multi-million dollar lawsuit. (You can be assured that should such a case go to court and if the Durham 3 prevail and are awarded a huge stack o’ cash, either the school or a collective of other lefties will come to the rescue with the necessary funds to pay the settlement.)
ARGH!
Perhaps someone can explain to me how someone like Imus is fired and $harpton, Rosie O’Donnell, Bill Maher, Alec Baldwin and so forth are allowed to walk the streets.
God Bless and God Speed
John
Posted by: Jaksavin
at April 13, 2007 07:38 AM
John & Lynn - I've been away from the computer for a while...missed reading Ann's column and your posts!
Since I'm quite late, I can only say I hope Imus' lawyer succeeds in his behalf. Not that I am interested in Don Imus or his career, but the "word police" state of mind does not bode well for our country.
Ann, please keep this one on the front burner. The liberals want to "zip all conservatives' lips" and this is just the warmup. Great column!
I, too, am waiting to hear from the Duke admin and professors - Hope they will also soon be on the losing end of legal action on behalf of the Lacrosse players and coach. What a disgraceful exhibition of what our children are being subjected to in the name of education!
And, no, John, don't think any liberal will be let go due to their statements! Nor will any apologies be forthcoming!
Posted by: CapeConservative
at April 23, 2007 10:17 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
