March 22, 2006

Busybodies Or Tyrants?

Printer Friendly

By: Walter Williams

Some call the people behind the Washington-D.C.-based Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) busybodies, but I call them wannabe tyrants. Let's look at their agenda, which seeks greater control over our lives.

Last year, CSPI filed a lawsuit against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to reduce the amount of salt in packaged foods. They also called for the FDA to mandate warning labels on non-diet soft drinks that consumption increases the risk of obesity, tooth decay and osteoporosis. Earlier this year, CSPI announced its intent to sue Viacom Inc. and Kellogg Company for marketing junk food to children.

CSPI has long called for excise taxes on fatty foods, cars and TV sets. Their justification is that obesity adds to Medicare and Medicaid health costs. They want some of the tax revenue used to fund exercise facilities and government fitness campaigns.

There's no end to CSPI's consumer control agenda. They say, "Caffeine is the only drug that is widely added to the food supply." Therefore, they've called for caffeine warning labels. To deal with teenage and adult overconsumption of alcohol, they've called for doubling the tax on beer. According to them, "The last thing the world needs is more drinkers, even moderate ones."

To fight obesity among young people, CSPI calls for a fast-food advertising ban on TV programs seen by children. CSPI's director, Michael Jacobson, said, "We could envision taxes on butter, potato chips, whole milk, cheeses, [and] meat," adding that "CSPI is proud about finding something wrong with practically everything."

I'm guessing that most Americans, except politicians, find this control agenda offensive. Politicians might not find it offensive because controlling lives is their stock in trade, plus there's the promise of the higher revenues from food taxes. Most Americans who might find the CSPI agenda offensive are not motivated by principle. It's a matter of whose ox is being gored.

You say, "What do you mean, Williams?" CSPI tyrants are following almost to the letter the template created by the nation's anti-smoking zealots. Their fellow traveler, New York University professor Marion Nestle, says that the food industry "can't behave like cigarette companies. . . . Yet there's a lot of people who benefit from people being fat and sick, and the whole setup is designed to make people eat more. So the response to the food industry should be very similar to what happened with the tobacco companies."

The anti-smoking zealots started out with "reasonable" demands, such as warning labels on cigarette packs and no smoking sections on airplanes. They made exaggerated claims about the cost that smokers were imposing on the health care system. Then cigarette manufacturers faced multimillion-dollar lawsuits and multibillion-dollar local, state and federal extortion, not to mention confiscatory taxes, all of which are passed on to smokers in the form of higher prices.

Just recently, the City of Calabasas, Calif., adopted an ordinance that bans smoking in virtually all outdoor areas. Partial justification is to protect children from bad influences -- seeing adults smoking. Had the anti-smoking zealots revealed their entire agenda back in the '60s and '70s, they wouldn't have gotten much. By using the piecemeal approach, they've been successful beyond their dreams, and the food zealots are following their example.

I'd be interested to know just how many Americans would like to see done to our food industry what was done to the tobacco industry: massive multibillion-dollar lawsuits against food companies; massive suits against restaurants that serve too large a serving, and confiscatory taxes levied on foods and snacks deemed non-nutritious.

Consumers will pay for all of this in the form of higher food prices and fewer choices. There's also the possibility that food zealots in some cities, emboldened by the success of the anti-smoking zealots in Calabasas, who are concerned about smokers passing on bad habits to our youth, might call for an ordinance banning public appearance of obese people so as not to pass bad eating habits on to our children.

Posted by redguy at March 22, 2006 11:47 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.redstatesusa.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/440

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Busybodies Or Tyrants?:

» online gambling from online gambling
Emerson would willingly have adopted, with whatever modifications, the current [Read More]

Tracked on September 3, 2006 02:35 AM

» breast enhancement from breast enhancement
An adult bears the emblemless marks of experience, not the delusive corrugations of age. [Read More]

Tracked on September 5, 2006 12:23 AM

» insects feeding from insects feeding
[Read More]

Tracked on September 17, 2006 01:22 AM

» Cisplatin from Cisplatin
[Read More]

Tracked on September 25, 2006 08:04 AM

Comments

Mr. Williams makes a great point. Restricting personal (bad) habits or taxing consumer goods that some say create "a burden to society" may sound like a good idea, but people who feel this way are missing the big picture. The thing we really have to be wary of is the subtle, gradual usurpation of our freedoms, which is happening now, seemingly everywhere. I'm a non-smoker and I am in favor of smoking bans in public places, but I strongly support people's right to do themselves harm in whatever form that takes without government intervention, as long as that doesn't infringe on the rights of others. First the habit police, then the thought police. What next?

Posted by: KeninRoscoe [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 23, 2006 12:29 PM

Dr. Williams,

Excellent article, however, you had left out just one point. If the federal government stayed within its Constiutional mandate, Medicare would not exsit and therefore the government would not have to worry about what effect our food choices would have on our health.

Posted by: rabiddogg [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 23, 2006 07:12 PM

I quit smoking and gave up coffee at the same time ... and I've finally gotten lucid again.

I've gotten so lucid that I know how badly the American Public is being shook down by the Flim Flam Man at DNC under the banner of feel good consumerism.

Here's an IQ test:

While the Dems were screaming bloody murder about SSN going bankrupt, 'HOW MUCH' money did they demand that the USA give away to foreign tsunami victims? ... you know, like those grateful SOBs in Indonesia who declared Jihad on the USA over Danish cartoons.

And how much did we have left over for Katrina and the other disaters in the Gulf this year?

So, obviously, the Dems don't see a problem with wasting American tax dollars abroad because they can always get MUCH MORE from the same stupid voters, and still ignore SSN reform.

So who are the CSPI crowd? They and the DNC have one mission and one mission only ... to find more and better ways to rape your wallet and sell your soul all in the same package deal called 'feel good consumerism'.

The tobacco people only get a small fraction of the actual cost of a pack of cigs. The bulk of the price always was TAX added. Thanks to the tort lawyers the price is now way up, and the TAX money is going where??? Sure as hell not to SSN.

Same with the cost of gas at the pump. Most of the cost is TAX added. And where is all of that TAX money going? Sure as hell not to SSN.

There is no longer a reason for debating this in front of the American Public ... it is the time to ask the American People the all important question: JUST HOW STUPID ARE YOU???

Fixing SSN is easy. Lock it up so Congress can't get at it ... and it was LBJ who first raped SSN to foist off his Great Society Welfare Ghettos. Make it a manditory death sentence for any politician to even think about raping the fund again.

Next, apply means testing to Donald Trump, and anyone else who got wealthy enough to forfeit SSN.

But, most importantly, cut the foreign aid package in three parts:

One third goes right into SSN to help pay for all of those illegal aliens the Dems imported.

One third goes to countries who actually show some appreciation for the USA ... and none to those who keep spitting in our faces.

And one third is put in an interest drawing account to pay off the European and Japanese debt for us rebuilding their socialist cess-pit countries after WW2 ... it's not as if we HAD to do it, after all.

Posted by: Athling [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 25, 2006 03:31 AM

Too bad we cannot sue the CSPI (what a misnomer) for proposing restrictions on our freedom. Notice that they cannot (they won't even try) get their legislation passed through the democratic process. They must use the courts to have some black-robed tyrant to impose their will upon us.

Posted by: Loser [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 29, 2006 01:08 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


Regular Columnists

Ann Coulter
David Limbaugh
Debbie Schlussel
Rachel Marsden
Chris Adamo

Interesting Reads