September 22, 2005

What Would Reagan Do?

Printer Friendly

By: Ann Coulter

Perhaps President Bush has inadvertently nominated a true conservative to the court with this Roberts fellow. I remain skeptical based on the following facts:

(1) Anita Hill has not stepped forward to accuse Roberts of sexual harassment.

(2) The Democrats did not accuse Roberts of having a secret life as a racist.

(3) We have no idea what kind of videos he rents.

Also, I'm still steamed that Bush has now dashed my dreams of an all-black Supreme Court composed of eight more Clarence Thomases. Incidentally, eight more Clarence Thomases is the only form of human cloning I would ever support.

As liberal Hendrik Hertzberg wrote in The New Yorker, Roberts was a scared choice. After Hurricane Katrina, Bush was even more scared. So when he had to pick a chief justice, he renominated the Rorschach blot.

For Christians, it's "What Would Jesus Do?" For Republicans, it's "What Would Reagan Do?" Bush doesn't have to be Reagan; he just has to consult his WWRD bracelet. If Bush had followed the WWRD guidelines, he would have nominated Antonin Scalia for the chief justiceship.

As proof, I refer you to the evidence. When Reagan had an opening for chief justice, he nominated Associate Justice William Rehnquist. While liberals were preoccupied staging die-ins against Rehnquist and accusing him of chasing black people away from the polls with a stick — something they did not accuse Roberts of — Reagan slipped Scalia onto the court.

That's what Reaganesque presidents with a five-vote margin in the Senate typically do. Apart from toppling the Soviet Empire, Scalia remains Reagan's greatest triumph.

Scalia deserved the chief justiceship. He's the best man for the job. He has suffered lo these many years with Justices Souter, Kennedy and O'Connor. He believes in a sedentary judiciary. He's for judicial passivism. Scalia also would have been the first cigar-smoking, hot-blooded Italian chief justice, which I note the diversity crowd never mentions.

But most important, if Bush had nominated Scalia, liberals would have responded with their usual understated screams of genocide, and Bush could have nominated absolutely anyone to fill Justice O'Connor's seat. He also could have cut taxes, invaded Syria, and bombed North Korea and Cuba just for laughs. He could even have done something totally nuts, like enforce the immigration laws.

Even if Roberts turns out to be another Rehnquist (too much to hope for another Scalia!), we don't know that, Bush doesn't know that, and Bush has blown a golden opportunity to make Chuck Schumer the public face of the Democratic Party. A few weeks of Schumer as their spokesman, and normal Democrats would be clamoring for Howard Dean to get back on the stick. Teddy Kennedy would start showing up at hearings actually holding a double scotch.

Inasmuch as Bush must still choose a replacement for O'Connor, it's important to remember the "Sandra Day O'Connor bylaw" to the WWRD guidelines: Never appoint anyone like Sandra Day O'Connor to any court at any level.

Reagan had made a campaign promise to appoint a woman to the Supreme Court. He didn't say anything about appointing a ninny. But back in 1981, it was slim pickings for experienced female judges. O'Connor was a terrible mistake and will forever mar Reagan's record, but at least he did it only once.

Bush has already fulfilled all his campaign promises to liberals — and then some! He said he'd be a "compassionate conservative," which liberals interpreted to mean that he would bend to their will, enact massive spending programs, and be nice to liberals. When Bush won the election, that sealed the deal. It meant the Democrats won.

Consequently, Bush has enacted massive new spending programs, obstinately refused to deal with illegal immigration, opposed all conservative Republicans in their primary races, and invited Teddy Kennedy over for movie night. He's even sent his own father to socialize with aging porn star Bill Clinton.

(Sidebar on the aging porn star: Idiot Republicans fraternizing with the Clintons has not harmed the decadent buffoon's reputation abroad. A Chinese condom manufacturer recently named one of its condoms the "Clinton," a fitting tribute to the man who had Monica Lewinsky perform oral sex on him in the Oval Office on Easter Sunday. Their advertising slogans are: "Always wear a 'Clinton' when you're getting a 'Lewinsky'!"; "I still believe in a place called the G-spot"; "Extra-thin skinned!"; "For when you really, really want to feel her pain." Note to Bush: This isn't Walter Mondale. How about sending Pops on the road with Joey Buttafuoco?)

According to my WWRD wristwatch, it's time for Bush to invade Grenada, bomb Libya, fire the air traffic controllers, and joke about launching a first strike against the Soviet Union. In lieu of that, how about nominating a conservative to O'Connor's seat on the court? It would be a bold gesture.

Posted by redguy at September 22, 2005 07:47 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.redstatesusa.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/249

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What Would Reagan Do?:

» papmetro from aerator anvil axe barometer barrow papmetro [Read More]

Tracked on February 10, 2006 09:24 PM

» Sex in Me from Jay
Sex in Me [Read More]

Tracked on February 20, 2006 11:04 AM

» Nice stuff from Rax
Good stuff [Read More]

Tracked on February 24, 2006 10:25 AM

» Madures from Cent
Madures [Read More]

Tracked on February 26, 2006 08:07 PM

» Get firewall from Noi
Get firewall [Read More]

Tracked on February 27, 2006 05:23 AM

» I for sex! from Terry
I for sex! [Read More]

Tracked on March 4, 2006 11:49 AM

» Get satisfaction from Rean
Get satisfaction [Read More]

Tracked on March 15, 2006 06:26 PM

» internet poker from internet poker
Now online casino gambling gambling poker internet poker black jack online slot casino on net ! [Read More]

Tracked on April 5, 2006 10:04 PM

» poker from poker
Will poker poker poker . [Read More]

Tracked on April 6, 2006 09:56 PM

» texas holdem rule from texas holdem rule
Here party poker texas holdem rule party poker . [Read More]

Tracked on April 7, 2006 06:32 PM

» online texas holdem from online texas holdem
No texas holdem strategy online texas holdem play texas holdem . [Read More]

Tracked on April 8, 2006 04:46 PM

» palm casino from palm casino
If you palm casino online texas holdem palm casino ! [Read More]

Tracked on April 10, 2006 02:59 PM

» poker from poker
With the poker free craps online casino slot ! [Read More]

Tracked on April 12, 2006 08:14 AM

» free slot machine game from free slot machine game
Will california casino online poker site free slot machine game . [Read More]

Tracked on April 14, 2006 01:41 AM

» free slot machine game from free slot machine game
Will california casino online poker site free slot machine game . [Read More]

Tracked on April 14, 2006 01:41 AM

» online poker from online poker
Please tough online poker ! [Read More]

Tracked on April 15, 2006 08:31 PM

» 888 poker from 888 poker
On other hand 888 poker rack ! [Read More]

Tracked on April 16, 2006 12:52 AM

» Cheap pills from Ort
spyware movie [Read More]

Tracked on April 17, 2006 06:09 PM

» play craps from play craps
Have multiplayer play craps on line ! [Read More]

Tracked on April 19, 2006 12:42 PM

» Sex for all from eric
Sex for all [Read More]

Tracked on April 24, 2006 09:22 AM

» Lesbians from Keb
Lesbians [Read More]

Tracked on April 24, 2006 09:55 AM

» casino on net from casino on net
Those cycle download casino on net rabbits . [Read More]

Tracked on April 25, 2006 08:26 AM

» play blackjack from play blackjack
Find play blackjack online free ? [Read More]

Tracked on April 25, 2006 12:18 PM

» Busstop Whores from Busstop Whores
Gang bang my wife hand-written gang bang my wife milf spy cam eight-and-a-half-foot milf spy cam. [Read More]

Tracked on April 29, 2006 01:19 AM

» play black jack from play black jack
Let's begin seven play black jack ! [Read More]

Tracked on May 2, 2006 09:40 PM

» play black jack from play black jack
In other words play black jack ? [Read More]

Tracked on May 2, 2006 09:59 PM

» online slot from online slot
Find online slot tipping ? [Read More]

Tracked on May 7, 2006 12:14 PM

» craps from craps
Probably game craps card ? [Read More]

Tracked on May 8, 2006 07:20 AM

» Online Prescription Pharmacy from Online Prescription Pharmacy
Prescriptions online mutilated prescriptions online drugs online without a prescription bumptious drugs online without a prescription. [Read More]

Tracked on May 12, 2006 02:46 AM

» huge boobs from Foo1
gang bang group sex tit fucking gang bang [Read More]

Tracked on June 7, 2006 06:02 AM

» internet holdem free ments from internet holdem free ments
zillions.attrition nondeterministically perceivably.defenestrated:soberness?panelist rosebush internet holdem and free http://www.theinternetholdem.com/ [Read More]

Tracked on July 21, 2006 06:13 PM

» Ezekiel from Ezekiel
Trace Lloyd Adrian Ivan Amir [Read More]

Tracked on August 1, 2006 01:22 PM

» free live sex from free live sex
anal creampie fat pussy cheerleaders nude [Read More]

Tracked on August 16, 2006 04:04 PM

» tlemadol from tlemadol
[Read More]

Tracked on August 23, 2006 05:58 PM

» acupuncture knee pain from acupuncture knee pain
[Read More]

Tracked on September 6, 2006 07:04 PM

» bdsm cafe from bdsm cafe
Young Teens in Pantyhose Silvia Saint MPEG [Read More]

Tracked on September 11, 2006 11:17 AM

» hot cheerleaders from hot cheerleaders
pantyhose models Exploited Drunk Teens american bukkake [Read More]

Tracked on September 17, 2006 06:05 AM

» hot teen girls from hot teen girls
xanax addiction slot machine [Read More]

Tracked on September 24, 2006 05:29 PM

» lipitor from lipitor
incest stories huge clit lexapro for anxiety [Read More]

Tracked on September 25, 2006 01:44 PM

Comments

As Usual Ann sums up my feelings in just the right words. I would love to stand next to her at a coctail party. She has an amazing mind.

Posted by: skybiker [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 22, 2005 08:44 AM

It looks as though Ann is finally getting realistic about Bush. This is the most anti-Bush column of hers that I have read. She has been defending the indifensible for a long time. I don't know how she could support a President who is destroying the essence of this country with his failure to enforce the immigration laws.

Posted by: susie [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 22, 2005 10:51 AM

Preach it sister!

Posted by: nanom [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 22, 2005 11:48 AM

This criticism should only be a surprise to liberals who buy into their own disingenuous hyperbole that Bush is a far right wing idealogue. That has *never* been the case.

It should also not be seen by Democrats and fringists as a great hope of some new split in the Republican party. This tug of war between the moderate/liberal/laissez-faire/back-seater end of Republicanism and conservative reformists has existed at least since Reagan first took the oath of office.

Ann is right to demand more conservative appointments. There is no reason not to expect that with a Republican administration and a Republican majority. We've come through as voters, but it seems too many Republicans are content to remain back seaters and allow a ruling class of Democrats to continue holding sway.

Posted by: Carson Fire [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 22, 2005 01:09 PM

Ann: We conservatives love you. It is obvious that Bush Jr is asking us to "read his lips" while he appeases the liberal elite.

Rather than using the current political power of the right to enforce immigration, he allows murders to find safe haven in Mexico. Rather than putting strong moral judges on the Supreme Court he presents an unknown. Rather than encourage the poor to work he keeps them poor by Government hand outs.

I believe he has removed himself from the common working men and women of America.

He lacks good leadership, communication and the tenacity of Reagan. He has become part of the problem of the "dumbing down" of America, rather than the solution.

What Republican is going to defeat Hillary in the next election with such a lackluster performance from Bush?

Posted by: richard hayes [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 22, 2005 04:22 PM

Yes, we've seen enough of the "Kumbayah" side of Bush. It's time he exercises some bold "bravado" and stirs things up on the beltway. I hope somthing happens soon that really ticks him off (not another attack on U.S. soil, but some Democrat saying something above and beyond the normal level of stupidity) and we see more of his "Don't mess with Texas" attitude. I do think he has it in him. I hope he let's it loose in '06.

Posted by: muchmomma [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 22, 2005 10:36 PM

I agree with you, Ann. I have been keeping my fingers crossed hoping that W. will do the right thing. He is better than his dad, but not by as much as I would like. No one was better than Ronaldus Magnus.

I wish Bush would give us a great line like Reagan's: "The bombing starts in five minutes."

Posted by: Loser [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 23, 2005 12:19 AM

Who was it that said that Bush's favorite president was Reagan? The Democrats don't know that they lost and the Republicans don't know that they won. The Democrat party is dead, finished. Look who leads the party, they don't have anyone who is a true leader. They don't have any issues. Even their view of what would be an ideal president (as in the "West Wing") is Reagan made over as a liberal Democrat. We need someone who will do what Reagan did to the Soviet Union. Instead of keeping the Democrats on life support, pull the plug. Now that's a "Right to Die" I would support!

Posted by: snowmane [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 23, 2005 12:44 PM

Great column as always. I've defended Bush and defended him. What finally got to me was his making nice with Bill Clinton. He tried that with Teddy "the bloat murderer" Kennedy, and it didn't work. He made a big deal out of Clinton when his picture was hung. (It should have been Clinton instead). Now, he sends Clinton around with Dad. Clinton spits in his face. Enough already! I hope he appoints Janet Rodgers Brown.
Lady Professor

Posted by: Ladyprofessor [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 24, 2005 05:05 PM

I tend to agree to the extent that I think Mr. Bush is hurting himself by trying to be all things to all people. Now is the time for him to stand by his conservative convictions and nominate people with like values to the Supreme Court.

Posted by: mcrider [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 28, 2005 05:58 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


Regular Columnists

David Limbaugh
Debbie Schlussel
Rachel Marsden
Chris Adamo

Interesting Reads